Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Perhaps, if you didn't mind sometimes getting a wrong answer. Well, it would be a heuristic which would close the deleted file *almost* all the time. When it didn't, the next check would probably catch it. Assuming that you would never get an indication that it was different when it hadn't changed, the worst that could happen is that you infrequently get the current behavior. That all *seems* sane to me, if low priroity. Any objections to my putting it on the TODO list? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
