Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for fixing that problem.  Out of curiousity, did you put that
> code in the renameatt() function for any reason, or is it just a 
> style thing?

Just to avoid closing and reopening the target relation and pg_attribute
relation.  Releasing and then reacquiring the lock on pg_attribute
seemed like a not-so-good idea, although it probably shouldn't make any
difference.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to