Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for fixing that problem. Out of curiousity, did you put that > code in the renameatt() function for any reason, or is it just a > style thing?
Just to avoid closing and reopening the target relation and pg_attribute relation. Releasing and then reacquiring the lock on pg_attribute seemed like a not-so-good idea, although it probably shouldn't make any difference. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org