On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:07:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Josh Berkus wrote: >>> Not everything is sanely convertible into some sort of plugin. A plugin >>> mechanism for this would be FAR more trouble that it is worth, IMNSHO. >>> >>> We are massively over-egging this pudding (as a culinary blogger you >>> should appreciate this analogy). >>> >> >> OK, then let's just accept it. It's small, has a maintainer, is useful >> to some people, and doesn't create any wierd complications. I think, >> given the knowledge that YAML is now a subdialect of JSON it could >> potentially be made smaller, but I can't say how at the moment. > > Actually, it's the other way, JSON is a subset of YAML.
I've no contribution to the main topic, but I'd like to point out that the "JSON is a subset of YAML" meme is not without controversy: http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/JSON-XS-2.26/XS.pm#JSON_and_YAML It may not be relevant in your use-case, but I thought it worth a mention. Tim. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
