Greg Smith wrote: > Jonas J wrote: > >P.S.: I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1.4 to run with TPCC-UVA benchmarks tests... > Ah. PostgreSQL 8.1 is significantly slower than the current > versions, and you're not going to get as much help with issues > related to the source code as if you're using a newer one. For > example, I don't know the 8.1 buffer implementation code nearly as > well because I didn't really start tinkering with it until 8.2, so > some of the things you're asking about I don't have easy access or > recollection of.
8.1 didn't have lock partitioning, so BufMappingLock was a serious problem back then. Completely different from the current code. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
