Ron Mayer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, the bottom line is that this effort should grow the development
> > and user community of Postgres --- it if doesn't, it is a failure.
> 
> Really?  Even if it only allows existing Postgres users and companies to
> expand their use into higher security applications IMHO it's a success.
> 
> If a main goal were increasing users, implementing MySQL-isms
> and MSFTSqlServer-isms would seem the biggest bang for the buck.

Well, it should expand the user-base because right now we don't have
many current users who are looking for these features --- if we did, it
would be an easy decision to add these features.  Second, it should add
new developers because we have limited developer resources, and I am not
sure adding additional security is at the top of our priority list, and
we don't have many security-expert developers so by definition we need
more to implement this reliably.

These might be unpleasant opinions, but I believe they are accurate.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to