Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I think we need to do something. I don't really want to tack > another 5-6% overhead onto EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Maybe we could recast the > doInstrument argument as a set of OR'd flags?
I'm thinking the same thing (OR'd flags) right now.
The attached patch adds INSTRUMENT_TIMER and INSTRUMENT_BUFFERS flags.
The types of QueryDesc.doInstrument (renamed to instrument_options) and
EState.es_instrument are changed from bool to int, and they store
OR of InstrumentOption flags. INSTRUMENT_TIMER is always enabled when
instrumetations are initialized, but INSTRUMENT_BUFFERS is enabled only if
we use EXPLAIN BUFFERS. I think the flag options are not so bad idea because
of extensibility. For example, we could support EXPLAIN CPU_USAGE someday.
One issue is in the top-level instrumentation (queryDesc->totaltime).
Since the field might be used by multiple plugins, the first initializer
need to initialize the counter with all options. I used INSTRUMENT_ALL
for it in the patch.
=# EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT * FROM pgbench_accounts;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on pgbench_accounts (cost=0.00..263935.00 rows=10000000 width=97)
(actual time=0.003..572.126 rows=10000000 loops=1)
Total runtime: 897.729 ms
=# EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) SELECT * FROM pgbench_accounts;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on pgbench_accounts (cost=0.00..263935.00 rows=10000000 width=97)
(actual time=0.002..580.642 rows=10000000 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=163935
Total runtime: 955.744 ms
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
explain_buffers_20091214.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
