On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>> The other possible option that I hesitate to suggest is Windows >>>> Services for Unix or SUA as I think it's now called. >>>> >>> >>> You mean we should post flex to that? Or have you found someone who has >>> already? >>> >> >> No idea if someone has done it already. I'm just throwing it out there >> as an idea possibly worthy of further investigation. >> > > > Don't you need to have SUA installed to run a program built with SUA? Or are > you suggesting we can build a distributable flex executable with SUA which > would run standalone (as I did for 32bit Windows using Cygwin)? Requiring > developers to install SUA would be quite a siginificant extra burden, ISTM.
The latter. And I have no idea if it's actually an option - just throwing it out there as an idea. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
