Tatsuo Ishii writes:
 > I saw over 7 hours delay between postgresql.org and sever1.pgsql.org.
 > Does anynone know what's happening here?

I've seen massive delays too:

Received:  from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
        id EAA08864; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:41 +0100 (BST)
Received:  from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
        id f9G3Oh219345; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:44 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
        by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9G3Ljq66512
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:23:36 -0500 (CDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from mail1.hub.org (webmail.hub.org [216.126.85.1])
        by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9FNaKP72316
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
        by mail1.hub.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9FGg8X57598
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
        by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9FGg6g02963
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

and this one's days:

Received:  from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
        id KAA11316; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100 (BST)
Received:  from postgresql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
        id f9G9Y3220747; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
        by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with SMTP id f9G0GHP83130;
        Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:16:27 -0400 (EDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
        by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9D4our63609;
        Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:56 -0400 (EDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
        by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9D4oqo09577;
        Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hardly any (yours omong the excepted, headers below) messages are
coming through in a timely fashion:

Received:  from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
        id PAA14131; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:46 +0100 (BST)
Received:  from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
        id f9GEHl222496; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:47 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
        by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9GEEEs48462
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:16:31 -0500 (CDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
        by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9GCDVP15349
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.13.152])
        by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id VAA16107
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [133.137.84.24])
        by sranhm.sra.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-srambox) with ESMTP id VAA10335
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:26 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lee.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to