On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Looking at it more closely, this is likely to be fallout from the >> plpgsql lexer/parser changes; it probably worked before only because >> plpgsql was doing its own thing rather than using the main lexer. > > Hmm .. yeah, words that are reserved according to the main grammar > could have worked as plpgsql variable names before, since they always > got replaced with "$n" before the main grammar saw them.
A list of such words, to be included in the Changes file, would be most useful I expect. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
