Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> wrote: > * Florian Pflug: >> On 16.12.09 16:40 , Kevin Grittner wrote: >>> Nicolas Barbier<nicolas.barb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am not sure whether the serialization failures that it may >>>> cause are dependent on the plan used. >>> >>> They are. >> >> But so are failures due to deadlocks even today, no? > > They are detected. In this context, "serialization failure" means > that PostgreSQL generates a history which lacks one-copy > serializability, without reporting any errors. (In the general > case, the unique constraint violation which bugs me personally is > a different beast and does result in an error.) I don't understand what you're saying here. Could you rephrase or expand on this? Thanks, -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
