Tom Lane escribió: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> [ I can already hear somebody insisting on a yaml type :-( ] > > > Now that's a case where I think a couple of converter functions at most > > should meet the need. > > Well, actually, now that you mention it: how much of a json type would > be duplicative of the xml stuff? Would it be sufficient to provide > json <-> xml converters and let the latter type do all the heavy lifting? > (If so, this patch ought to be hstore_to_xml instead.)
But then there's the matter of overhead: how much would be wasted by transforming to XML, and then parsing the XML back to transform to JSON? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
