On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still not really eager to introduce yet another category of > keywords, but perhaps it is worth doing. Comments?
If we consider that they can now be a problem in pl/pgsql, it might be a good idea to consider it for this release. (I'm thinking of http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] for instance) -- Guillaume -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
