Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a écrit : > Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> writes: >> Le 28/12/2009 10:07, Dave Page a écrit : >>> Yes, still waiting on the new API. > >> Is there something I can do to make this move forward? > > I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array > or two parallel arrays. Do you want to try coding up a sample usage > of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful? >
I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk about this. I feel pretty dumb, but I re-read every mail on "Application name patch - v2", "Application name patch - v3", and "Application name patch - v4" threads. I also re-read the "Client application name" thread. The only mail I see that relates to the new API is the one from Dave (the one I answered today). So, can someone point me to the thread that deals with this "new array-based libpq connect API"? or can someone explain it to me? Thanks. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
