Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote: > It might be kind of handy if I could getWarnings() on the > connection object without blocking so I could call it before I > executed a statement on the connection ... but that'd always > introduce a race between transaction cancellation/timeout and > statement execution, so code must always be prepared to handle > timeout/cancellation related failure anyway. +1 (I think) If I'm understanding this, it sounds to me like it would be most appropriate for the NOTICE to generate a warning at the connection level and for the next request to throw an exception in the format suggested by Heikki -- which I think is what Craig is suggesting. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
