Hi Tom-san. Ahh.. It was correction of the test of often... again, the pursued relation was seen, I think that it is good now. Thanks!!
Regards, Hiroshi Saito----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
"Hiroshi Saito" <z-sa...@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> writes:[ examples_win32_patch2 ]Is the addition of -DFRONTEND actually needed, and if so why? We shouldn't be depending on that in any user-exposed code, I would think. Otherwise I don't have any objection to this version. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
examples_win32_patch3
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
