On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:45, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada <tsut...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >> >> 2) use appropriate macro and datatypes for Windows API. >> enables more than 32bits shared memory. > > Are you sure this one should use __noop, and not __nop? > > __noop: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s6btaxcs.aspx > __nop: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa983381.aspx > > I think __nop is what we want? > > Also, that turns it into "nop" and not "rep nop", no?
I did some more research, and __nop() is at least closer than __noop(), but it's still not the same. > Should we perhaps instead use __yield, per: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2b2h26kx.aspx On further reading, __yield() is only available on Itanium. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
