On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I think it would be better to utilize the existing array of child > processes in pmsignal.c. Instead of having postmaster peek into > WalSndCtlData, let's add a new state to PMChildFlags, > PM_CHILD_WALSENDER, which is just like PM_CHILD_ACTIVE but tells > postmaster that the child is not a normal backend but a walsender.
Seems good. > I've done that in my git branch. Could you push that git branch to a public place? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
