Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> However, wouldn't it make more logical sense to replace "host/hostssl"
>> with "replication/replicationssl" rather than overload the database
>> field?
> Seems good. How about the following formats?
> replication user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options]
> replicationssl user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options]
> replication user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options]
> replicationssl user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options]
> Note that "database" field has been removed since it's useless
> for replication.
I'm getting more and more confused here. I thought we were talking
about client-side .pgpass. This seems to be talking about pg_hba.conf.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
