Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
while I agree that HS is very useful without SR, I think that it's
mostly the well known powerusers inthe community are actively waiting
for HS and not so much for SR. For the typical user outside of -hackers
or even -general I'm not so sure about that...
Well, I can state that we have plenty of clients that would be very
interested in HS, but none that would really care if it came without
SR. This power user knows a lot of people outside of -hackers and
- -general and they are what I'm basing my opinion on. :)
that is more or less my point but maybe I phrased it badly :) Real
database powerusers are mostly interested in HS. THe people that are
coming from a different background or maybe MySQL are likely going to
find something that requires doing a base backup, implementing wal
shipping and installing pg_standby(or some other custom scripts) akward...
Stefan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
