On fre, 2010-01-08 at 10:02 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Now, I'll second Greg Smith and Tom here, in that I think we need to > run > the last commitfest as usual, knowing that the outcome of the > commitfest > for any given patch is not "it made it" but "we reviewed it". It's > still > right for the project to bump a patch on resources ground rather than > on > technical merit, at the end of the commitfest.
+1, leave everything as is. The commitfest is a tool for people to track what is going on, not a tool to tell people what to do. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
