> Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something* > on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally > considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps > much though; it just means we need more time in beta.
Well, we're shipping an alpha, aren't we? My proposal for "beta in 2 weeks" was based on the idea of having *no* new patches in CF4, at all. Given the reality of HS+SR, I don't think it's realistic anymore either. --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
