Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> plus, it looks like that most of the patents have either expired, or
> are about to expire. lzo is used all over the place, including the
> linux kernel...i think the burden of proof rests with anyone claiming
> there are patent problems, not the other way around. lzo is also gpl
> so we can't use it :D. regarding fastlz and patents, who knows? I'm
> curious...does anyone know of a case where a high profile open source
> project was found to be violating a patent?
You have got that 100% backwards. We are not going to bet the survival
of the Postgres project on whether we can get away with violating
somebody's patent.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
