2010/1/13 Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at>: > Tom Lane írta: >> >> If this patch is touching those parts of relcache.c, it probably needs >> rethinking. >> > > What I did there is to check the return value of LockRelationOid()
the hunk was because a diference in the position (i guess patch accept a hunk of reasonable size, assuming there is something like a reasonable size for that) and is not touching the same as your refactor (sorry if i explain myself bad) > and also elog(PANIC) if the lock wasn't available. > Does it need rethinking? > well, i actually think that PANIC is too high for this... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
