Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> I think we could easily improve that by having it look something like
> this instead:
> Table "public.test2"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> --------+---------+-----------
> a | integer | PK
> b | integer | PK
> Indexes:
> "test2_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a, b)
Spelling out "primary key" would seem to be more in keeping with existing
entries in that column, eg we have "not null" not "NN".
I think this is a sensible proposal for a single-column PK, but am less
sure that it makes sense for multi-col. The modifiers column is
intended to describe column constraints; which a multi-col PK is not,
by definition.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
