Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> I think it's a tools/build process problem and should be attacked that >> way. > > Specifically, I think you missed out $(BE_DLLLIBS) in SHLIB_LINK. > We'll find out at the next mingw build...
Thanks. But what is BE_DLLLIBS? I can't find any description of it. I suspect the MinGW build will fail because of the missing PGDLLIMPORTs. Before we sprinkle all the global variables it touches with that, let me explain what I meant by dividing walreceiver code differently between dynamically loaded module and backend code. Right now I have to go to sleep, though, but I'll try to get back to during the weekend. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
