Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> 2010/1/2 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> If those are a problem then presumably syslogger_parseArgs needs work
>> too ... and I rather wonder where the value it's reading comes from.
> Well, it doesn't generate a warning.. It only did that when the cast
> was incorrect. Should we add it purely for consistency?
You're missing the point entirely: this isn't about suppressing a
warning, it's about that the code will fail outright if the pointer value
doesn't fit in 32 bits. "int fd" is no good, and "atoi" is no good, and
I wonder what is being used to print the text string that the atoi gets
fed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
