Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
> 2010/1/17 Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>:
>> Maybe I'm hallucinating and someone could check this in their
>> environment, but it appears to me that the Git repository is missing
>> parts of two non-recent commits. See attached patch.
> Not having looked at the repo in detail, but I bet this happened
> because the git mirror grabbed it's snapshot in the middle of a cvs
> commit with multiple files. Since cvs doesn't have atomic commits, I
> think that kind of thing can happen.
That would explain a single CVS commit appearing as two separate commits
in the git history; but it hardly seems like an acceptable excuse for
missing changes altogether, which is what I think Peter said he saw.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
