On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 08:28 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >>> It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a > >> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode. > >> > >> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send > >> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL. > > > > Is that something you're working on? > > No.
How accurate is this now? With regard to remaining items of work. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Streaming_Replication -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
