On sön, 2010-01-17 at 23:54 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I always assumed that it was printing the names as the tests finished, > probably because of the way the output is staggered. If they were > printed when the tests were started, the list would be printed all but > simultaneously.
Well, as long as someone expects it to be that way, then I guess that'd be OK. I am concerned about an inconsistency with the serial tests that go test foo ... <pause>ok whereas with the parallel tests don't give any indication what test has started. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
