Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Yes. Just like with pg_standby. > > Hehe, I'm using walmgr.py from skytools instead, and this discussion > makes me think I'll continue doing so even if using SR, as they are > complementary solutions. > > In SR mode, the master continues to archive as usual, and the slave will > either take the WAL on a per-file basis from the restore_command or on > an per-LSN basis from the walreceiver and a live connection to the > master, right?
Right. > Does it mean any working wal shipping setup (pitrtools, walmgr.py) will > continue working unchanged, or should we begin testing those and > scheduling adaptations to 9.0? They will continue to work as is, just leave standby_mode=off. But if you want to take advantage streaming replication, you'll have to switch it to 'on', and adapt the scripts to work with that. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
