Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >> So add me to the list of people who think that if >> these are going to be recurring, we should look at moving from >> cvs to git as soon as 9.0 is released. > > The gating factor is not release schedule; it is the still- > unaddressed tasks that must be done before we can consider moving. > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Switching_PostgreSQL_from_CVS_to_Git If you think people can work on that list without risk of delaying the release, OK. I was assuming that such work would be too disruptive to work on at this point in a release cycle, and might possibly pull time from folks who would otherwise be working on the release. Do you disagree? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
