On Jan 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > This is exactly the claim that I have zero confidence in. Quite > frankly, the problem with Perl as an extension language is that Perl was > never designed to be a subsystem: it feels free to mess around with the > entire state of the process. We've been burnt multiple times by that > even with the limited use we make of Perl now, and these proposed > additions are going to make it a lot worse IMO.
Can you provide an example? Such concerns are impossible to address without concrete examples. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
