Andres Freund wrote: > On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote: > > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for > > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes. > > > > > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at > > > all. > > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at > > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This > > is a work item, and not a small one. > What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?
You mean turned on by default, right? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
