* Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> [100130 19:55]: > If I am developing, say, a new > perl facility, I expect to develop and test using a private installation > of perl, and not screw up my system's perl. It's the same with postgres.
But, perl was a bad example. If you're just trying to develop a new "perl module", something that other perl scripts can use, to require you to provide a completely private copy of complete perl, instead of the perfectly identical (other than paths) version the system provides is a bit much... I'm not arguing that the PGXS gripes Ivan has are valid, but your perl example probably *supports* his case more than you think... -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, ai...@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
