Marko Kreen wrote: > Psycopg was the leader, especially in web-environments, > but it has non-obvious license and with dead website it does not > seem that attractive. Although it is well-maintained still. > > Best path forward would be to talk with Psycopg guys about > license clarification/change. > > I suspect GPL does not extend anyway to Python code that imports > it dynamically, and it does not seem to be their intention - they > even try to tell it in their current clarification, but it > is not as clear as it could be.
Yes, this is a good analysis and has some good suggestions for moving forward. In summary, I don't think the current PG/Python driver situation is helping PG or Python, and I believe there are enough people who care about those two to get a group together to sort out a viable direction and start working toward the goal of improving things. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
