Good idea, implemented.

Hmm.  I think your implementation is prone to overflow in two places -
both when computing step, and also when stepping through the array.

Pls, point me, I don't see that
!       step |= (step >>  1);
!       step |= (step >>  2);
!       step |= (step >>  4);
!       step |= (step >>  8);
!       step |= (step >> 16);
!       step ++;
!       step >>= 1;
!
!       while(step > 0) {
!               int i;

!               for (i = step-1; i < nentry; i += 2 * step)
!                       ginInsertEntry(accum, heapptr, attnum, entries[i]);

!               step >>= 1; /* /2 */
!       }


Proposed revision attached, with also some rewriting of the comment
for that function.

make check fails with your patch:

#3 0x083d2b50 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=Could not find the frame base for "ExceptionalCondition".
) at assert.c:57
#4 0x081086b6 in ginAppendData (old=0x287f2030, new=0x287f2044, arg=0xbfbfd5e4) at ginbulk.c:48
#5  0x083f5632 in rb_insert (rb=0x2acfe610, data=0x287f2044) at rbtree.c:359
#6 0x08108968 in ginInsertEntry (accum=0xbfbfd5e4, heapptr=0x28711af4, attnum=1, entry=2139062143) at ginbulk.c:135 #7 0x08108ad9 in ginInsertRecordBA (accum=0xbfbfd5e4, heapptr=0x28711af4, attnum=1, entries=0x2ac77068, nentry=6) at ginbulk.c:202
--
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teo...@sigaev.ru
                                                   WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to