Tom Lane escribió: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> We can still hope that some feedback comes in during beta. > > >> I'm not opposed to that in principal, but in practice the PGadmin > >> folks may not like us very much if we change things too drastically if > >> they've got it working the way we had it... �we'll just have to see > >> what reports we get, I suppose. > > > We're not planning to reimplement our existing parser for this release > > so it won't bother us if you want to bash about any of the new > > formats. > > Well, you're going to have to do more than zero work even with that > plan, given the changes already made to the text format. It would be > really nice if we could get some feedback on the non-text formats > *before* they're set in stone.
Is Redhat's Visual Explain still alive? And what about Tom Raney's stuff? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
