"Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be fairly straight forward to simply copy the domain base
> type into the atttypid, then create an atttypdomain (normally 0,
> except in the case of a domain). Everything would use the attypid,
> except for \d and pg_dump which could use the domain if it exists.
> Is this something I should do?
No, because it's quite irrelevant to the problem of type coercion,
which works with expressions; attributes are only one part of the
expression world.
Actually, considering Fernando's point that a CAST ought to apply the
constraints associated with a domain type, your attribute-based
implementation is wrong anyway. Rather than merging the domain
constraints into the table definition (which will be a nightmare for
pg_dump to sort out, anyway) keep 'em separate. The constraints could
be checked during casting from a base type to a domain type --- take a
look at the existing mechanism for enforcing typmod (length limits),
which after all is a simplistic kind of domain constraint.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
