Tom Lane escribió: > Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes: > > Searching the archives ain't helping me refresh those memories. So it > > seems the case for an extended opclass infrastructure, or a new side > > one, is between thin an non-existent yet? > > Yeah, I don't immediately see anything that would justify going to > that level of effort. Adding +/- as support functions for btree > seems like the thing to do.
Would it work to use a fake access method instead? If we add it to btree, will we be able to backtrack and move that to a separate catalog if we ever determine that it would have been better? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
