Arie Bikker wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and
> others.
> This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it
> the right way (hope you agree!).

Hi,

I see the patch has been marked as "Returned with Feedback" on the 6th
of February, I assume on grounds of prolonged silence about it. I
confess it was partly my fault, because soon after posting the review I
suddenly had to focus on other things.

I won't be able to review the new version in the next few days, and this
commitfest is closing anyway... However I would hate to see that patch
just disappear, as I think it's useful and you obviously invested some
work in it.

At this stage I would suggest moving it to the first 9.1 commitfest,
since it's a nice feature, but not one we should burden the committers
with this late in the development cycle.

Arie, care to add that last version of the patch to the 2010-Next
commitfest?

Cheers,
Jan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to