Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > Greg Stark escribió: >> Oops. Well, I would like to know if I'm in the minority and have to >> roll this back before I fix that.
> My personal opinion is that displaying number of blocks in all EXPLAIN > formats is more consistent. FWIW, I vote for number of blocks too. I tend to see those numbers as more indicative of number of I/O requests than amount of memory used. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers