Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Greg Stark escribió:
>> Oops. Well, I would like to know if I'm in the minority and have to
>> roll this back before I fix that.
> My personal opinion is that displaying number of blocks in all EXPLAIN
> formats is more consistent.
FWIW, I vote for number of blocks too. I tend to see those numbers as
more indicative of number of I/O requests than amount of memory used.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers