Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 2. Add an extra lock to serialize writers to the queue, so that messages
>> are guaranteed to be added to the queue in commit order. As long as
> fwiw, I think you're definitely on the right track. IMO, any scenario
> where an issued notification ends up being deferred for an indefinite
> period of time without alerting the issuer should be avoided if at all
> possible. Just to clarify though, does your proposal block all
> notifiers if any uncommitted transaction issued a notify?
It will block other notifiers until the transaction releases its locks,
which should happen pretty promptly --- there are no user-accessible
reasons for it to wait.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
