Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Jakub Ouhrabka wrote: > >> Was autovacuum requesting to write this 20MB file 650x per minute? > > > Yes, exactly. > > > Ideally, autovacuum would only request a new copy of the file if the one > > it got was considerably out of date. Obviously a tenth of a second is > > not old enough. > > Wasn't it you that insisted on a short staleness criterion for autovac > in the first place?
well, my current opinion is that we should spend some nonzero amount of thought into figuring out what to do. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
