On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: >> Yes, but if it's a variadic function, I suspect that it won't often be >> called with the same number of args. So you'd potentially end up >> caching a lot of extra stuff that would never be used again. > > Potentially. Patches welcome!
GitHub. ;-P > Umm, perhaps F->funcname(@args), or PG->funcname(@args), or ... ? > > Anyone got any better suggestions? PG is good. Or maybe DB? >> By the way, I think it needs some documentation explaining how to load it >> inside PL/Perl. > > I thought about that, and started to write it, but dropped it for now. > I'll wait till my "cunning plan" to share code with the Safe compartment > (aka PostgreSQL::PLPerl::Injector) is done then document how call() can > be used in both plperlu and plperl. Ah, okay. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
