On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:26:29AM -0200, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > David Fetter escreveu: > > OK, I know it's late, but having PL/pgsql on by default has caused > > an unforeseen need: --require-language. > > > Why? IMHO pg_regress should be used with the same postgres version > it was built with. So any tests that use --load-language=plpgsql > should be fixed. Besides we could patch pg_regress.c to ignore > loading plpgsql language into the database (instead of adding > another parameter -- we already have too many options).
Any external projects will fail on this if they're attempting to support both pre-9.0 and post-9.0 PostgreSQLs. David Wheeler has suggested that we special-case PL/pgsql for 9.0 and greater, as it's in template0, where those tests are based. Cheers, Another David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
