Uh, I don't see this patch as applied. Was it not necessary? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It looks like this is enough to reproduce the cache lookup failure: > > The "cache loopup failure" part could be fixed by the attached patch. > It forbids explaining if the transaction is in error state. > > I cannot reproduce "unexpected refassgnexpr" and "unexpected FieldStore" > errors yet. We might need another fix for them. > > Regards, > --- > ITAGAKI Takahiro > NTT Open Source Software Center > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
