On 2/24/10 5:58 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > > I though about that for a minute, but didn't think pg_stop_backup is a > common enough operation that anyone will complain that it's a little > more verbose in its logging now. I know when I was new to this, I used > to wonder just what it was busy doing just after executing this command > when it hung there for a while sometimes, and would have welcomed this > extra bit of detail--preferably immediately, not even after a 5 or 10 > second delay.
+1 --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
