On 2/26/10 6:57 AM, Richard Huxton wrote: > > Can we not wait to cancel the transaction until *any* new lock is > attempted though? That should protect all the single-statement > long-running transactions that are already underway. Aggregates etc.
I like this approach. Is it fragile in some non-obvious way? --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
