* Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> [100226 23:39]: > Just not having the actual query running on the master is such a > reduction in damage that I think it's delivering the essence of what > people are looking for regardless. That it might be possible in some > cases to additionally avoid the overhead that comes along with any > long-running query is a nice bonus, and it's great the design allows for > that possibility. But if that's only possible with risk, heavy > tweaking, and possibly some hacks, I'm not sure that's making the right > trade-offs for everyone.
Would we (ya, the royal we) be willing to say that if you want the benifit of removing the MVCC overhead of long-running queries you need to run PITR backup/archive recovery, and if you want SR, you get a closed-loop master-follows-save-xmin behaviour? a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, ai...@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
