On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> writes: >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that. The only benefit of the >>> change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax. > >> then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches? > > What's to fix? The documentation already makes it quite clear where > you're supposed to put the label. I think documenting the code's > actual behavior could only confuse people. >
ah! yeah! sorry for the noise... it was just the need to say something else... ;) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
